Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Moto G200 5G is much newer than the LG G7 ThinQ, it is thicker and heavier.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit superior CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto G200 5G takes much better pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.