Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ, with an 86.2 score against 84.3. The Moto G200 5G is a newer cellphone than LG G8 ThinQ, but it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better number of pixels per inch in the display. LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G200 5G has a little better hardware performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G takes better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.