Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, with an 86.2 score against 82.5. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Moto G200 5G is a extremely newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's way heavier and thicker.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G200 5G captures way better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.