Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is much newer, but thicker and heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The Moto G200 5G has a bit superior processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size. The Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.