Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. The Moto G200 5G body is noticeably newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features.
The Moto G200 5G features a little faster processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a much smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.