Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's general score of 86.2. The LG Velvet design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. The Motorola Moto G200 5G and the LG Velvet both have really similar screens, they have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a same size display and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.