Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 86.2 score against 77. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Even being the best phone in this review, it must be told that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and heavier phone.
The Moto G200 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo's memory to install applications and games is very similar to Moto G200 5G's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Moto G200 5G count with extremely similar batteries duration. Motorola Moto G200 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.