Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Polar night |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, having a score of 86.2 against 80.5. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a lighter phone than Nokia 8.3 5G, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Moto G200 5G also has a just a little better display pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8.3 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.