Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | -- |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, with a global score of 86.2 against 76.2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Moto G200 5G's design is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G200 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite worse screen density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Galaxy A16 5G has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G200 5G has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G200 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a battery duration that is just as good as the battery performance in Motorola Moto G200 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.