Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is better than Galaxy A22, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 76.1. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. Although the Moto G200 5G is a better cellphone than Galaxy A22, we must note that it is also just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
Moto G200 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G200 5G features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
Moto G200 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP. Samsung Galaxy A22 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Moto G200 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.