Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30, getting a global score of 86.2 against 79.6. The Moto G200 5G is a incredibly newer device than Samsung Galaxy A30, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.