Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is better than Galaxy A33 5G's 77.8 global score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has 11 version while Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12 version. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a just a little heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G200 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A33 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Moto G200 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.