Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-11-18 | -- |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A34's 82.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version. The Moto G200 5G has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G200 5G and Galaxy A34 both have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A34 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Moto G200 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G and the Galaxy A34 both feature extremely similar battery durations. Moto G200 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.