Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 86.2 against 79.4. Moto G200 5G's design is just a bit lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen. Galaxy A35 5G's memory for games and applications is just as good as Moto G200 5G's one, both have equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's battery duration is just as good as the Motorola Moto G200 5G one. Moto G200 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.