Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy A40, with an 86.2 score against 79.6. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is way newer, but somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than Galaxy A40. These devices include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a slightly better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater display pixel density. Galaxy A40 features a better storage for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.