Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Motorola Moto G200 5G's design is notably newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A5 (2017). Galaxy A5 (2017) has a screen that's very similar to the screen in Moto G200 5G, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a way smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.