Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, getting an 86.2 score against 83.8. Moto G200 5G's body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A50. The Moto G200 5G and the Galaxy A50 feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Moto G200 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.