Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a global score of 86.6 against 86.2. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version. Even though the Galaxy A50s is notably older than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a screen that's just as good as Motorola Moto G200 5G's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy A50s counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.