Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A51, with an 86.2 score against 85.5. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Even though the Motorola Moto G200 5G is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A51, it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Moto G200 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel number in each inch in the screen. Moto G200 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G200 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also has a way more MP camera and a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.