Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is a bit better than Moto G200 5G's 86.2 general score. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is older than Moto G200 5G, it's construction is a little thinner and a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a screen that's just as good as Moto G200 5G's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite better screen density. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G200 5G features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.