Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having a 91.3 score against 86.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Moto G200 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto G200 5G, even though they were released only 8 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Moto G200 5G have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 64 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.