Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than the Moto G200 5G, with a 91.1 score against 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G200 5G, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
The Galaxy A52s and Moto G200 5G feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels in each inch of screen. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures. The Galaxy A52s counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.