Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a score of 86.2 against 75.8. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is a lot newer, but thicker and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a larger display and a little bit greater display pixels density. The Moto G200 5G has more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a much higher (4K) video definition and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.