Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a score of 86.2 against 76.9. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features. Even though Motorola Moto G200 5G is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A70, it is just a bit heavier and thicker.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit more pixels per display inch and a little bigger screen. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A70 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.