Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 score. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G200 5G, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before.
Moto G200 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a little bit better pixel number in each inch in the screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A71 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way worse 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G200 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.