Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than Moto G200 5G, getting a general score of 92.9 against 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older phone than the Moto G200 5G, but Samsung was able to make it a little lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a screen that's just as good as the screen in Moto G200 5G, although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit smaller display, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little worse screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos. The Moto G200 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.