Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 score. The Moto G200 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), but it is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit bigger display, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G has greater battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.