Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy F23's 84.6 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy F23 and Motorola Moto G200 5G both feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy F23 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2408 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G200 5G has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy F23 features as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Moto G200 5G one, both of them have equal internal storage. Galaxy F23's battery life is just as good as the Moto G200 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.