Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F41, with a global score of 86.2 against 85.2. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system. The Moto G200 5G design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but it is just a bit heavier. Moto G200 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. The Galaxy F41 counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy F41 has superior battery performance than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.