Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 86.2. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should offer very similar OS features. Although the Galaxy F62 is better than the Moto G200 5G, we must tell that it is also a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little less pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Galaxy F62 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.