Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, blue and white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | PLS |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M12, with a overall score of 86.2 against 80. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Even when Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy M12 were released only 8 months apart, Moto G200 5G is just a bit lighter and just a little thinner.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a better screen density. Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy M12, because it has a bigger aperture, a way higher video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy M12 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features longer battery performance than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.