Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy M13's 81.1 global score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Motorola Moto G200 5G construction is a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy M13.
Galaxy M13 has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2408 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount per inch of screen. The Galaxy M13 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G200 5G, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy M13, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M13's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Moto G200 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.