Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, having a score of 86.2 against 78.9. Moto G200 5G is a just a little heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, but both are 0.35inches thick. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy M20 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M20 and Motorola Moto G200 5G both feature very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.