Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M21's 84.1 global score. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Moto G200 5G's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M21, but it is a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with better battery life than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 20% bigger battery capacity. Moto G200 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also has a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.