Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy M30, with a score of 86.2 against 82.4. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto G200 5G's body is much newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy M30.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a just a little better pixel count per inch in the screen. Moto G200 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher video definition. The Galaxy M30 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M30's battery duration is just as good as the Moto G200 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.