Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M40's 85 score. Even though the Moto G200 5G is newer than Galaxy M40, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version and Galaxy M40 has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features and increased performance.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy M40 counts with a display that is just as good as the Motorola Moto G200 5G one, because although the Galaxy M40 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.