Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 general score. Despite being the best device in this comparison, Galaxy M51's construction is older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Moto G200 5G. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
The Moto G200 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a quite larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. The Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy M51 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery duration than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 40 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy M51 and Motorola Moto G200 5G feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy M51 has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.