Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having a score of 90.8 against 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is just a little thinner and a little lighter than Moto G200 5G, although it was released around a year before. The Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G200 5G have extremely similar processing units, both have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G200 5G count with quite similar displays, although the Galaxy Note 20 has a quite smaller screen, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit worse pixels density. Galaxy Note 20's storage for apps and games is very similar to Moto G200 5G's one, both of them have the same internal memory.
Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and better video frame rate. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.