Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a 98.9 score against 86.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but Samsung made it just a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Moto G200 5G, because it has a better pixel quantity per inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G200 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.