Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.2. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a noticeably newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, giving a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit worse pixel amount per inch in the screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Moto G200 5G features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.