Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5, with a overall score of 86.2 against 79.3. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen pixel density. Moto G200 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.