Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Moto G200 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera. Moto G200 5G has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.