Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having an 89 score against 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an extremely older device than Moto G200 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Galaxy Note10 counts with a screen that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note10. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% bigger battery size. Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.