Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note10 Lite's 86.2 global score. Moto G200 5G's body is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a screen that is very similar to the Moto G200 5G one, although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller display. Moto G200 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G200 5G features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.