Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than Galaxy Note3's score of 77.7. Moto G200 5G's construction is a lot newer than Galaxy Note3's, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit higher pixels amount per inch in the display.
Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Moto G200 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.