Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a global score of 86.2 against 77.6. Moto G200 5G's design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note4. Galaxy Note4 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a camera with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Moto G200 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.