Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a score of 86.2 against 79.5. The Moto G200 5G design is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note7's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note7 features a little sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto G200 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. Moto G200 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.