Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note8's 83 general score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Moto G200 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note8, but it is a little thicker and just a little heavier.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Note8 features slightly more storage to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.