Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's global score of 86.2. Galaxy S10's construction is notably lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user very similar OS features.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10. They have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Moto G200 5G captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S10 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.