Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting a 93.6 score against 86.2. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an extremely older phone than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway.
Moto G200 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S10 5G has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a much smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.